« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: sks- actual vs published dims  (Read 492 times)

Ron

  • 6+ Year Member
  • 1000 Posts
  • ******
  • Posts: 2992
Re: sks- actual vs published dims
« on: September 27, 2010, 04:42:04 am »
jim, I would like to see the actual length, tip t tail as this two measrements really tell how much relaitive rise even in non-rockered skis. So if the UC is an actaul 178, it would tell me there's either quite a bit of rise in the tip and/or a pretty bit Twin on the tail. for now, can you measure the actual length of the  Watea?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »