« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: sks- actual vs published dims  (Read 513 times)

jim-ratliff

  • 6+ Year Member
  • 1000 Posts
  • ******
  • Posts: 2739
Re: sks- actual vs published dims
« Reply #15 on: October 08, 2010, 02:42:30 pm »
True.? But a similar extreme was WC slalom skiers on skis so short (and still stable and quick) that the WC imposed an artificial minimum length.

However, not real clear how much either of those extremes apply to average skiers.? I still agree with you that at least 1/2 of the upturned part of a twin-tip seems to be wasted ski material weight.? I'll have to do some googling on the origin of twin tips and why.

And I still like my UC's, one of the most complete and versatile skis I've ever anticipated skiing on.? ?:D
« Last Edit: October 08, 2010, 03:10:13 pm by jim-ratliff »
Logged
"If you're gonna play the game boy, ya gotta learn to play it right."
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »