realskiers

A few years back when I was looking for a new mtb I got caught up in all the bike tech and because of this I almost ended up with a hardtail due to the increased effeciency (pedal stroke energy isn't lost to the rear shock). Before my purchase I had a long talk with a friend that is a mtb expert. The long and short of that was to focus on what I, as a recreational rider, wanted. I ride in rough terrain and wanted a bike that would smooth it out as much as possible. I ride for excercise so having a ride that was somewhat less effecient is a hidden benefit (more exercise work done in the same period of time). So, after much hand wringing I ended up with a full suspension stumpjumper fsr. I really didn't want to pay for the big name brands as I figured I was getting less for my money, but I found a previous years model and got a good price on the bike and the bike's geometry was a very good fit. I could probably have done better but I had a limited amount of time to shop and wanted to get out on the trails on a bike that would feel good. It's a gret ride and I've never regretted the purchase. Currently riding with the SPD but planning on moving to a flat pedal. I've managed to get out of the SPDs when needed but had a few close calls. I think weight matters less than most realize for recreational riding and has that same hidden benefit of more exercise work done while out riding which is the goal for many of us!

Max: Agreed.  It depends on how and where you ride -- and Lynn and I have never regretted our full suspension decision.  At our ages, weight is more of an issue when lifting the bike than riding it.  We had storms late last week, so the weekend ride included some downed trees that were waist high for her.  Lifting her bike over a waist high tree trunk is much easier with the carbon than would be steel.  And, like you, we chose value rather than the big name.