Message #9983

[Ron]

To clarify, the 94 @ 186 has a 22m TR, the 176 is closer to 19. It's a much stiffer ski than the Pilgrim (although the Pilgrim is very torsionally stiff), manueverability-wise, the pilgrim Gary is on is a 169 TT, the 94 was a 176 raised tail. so being stiffer and considerably longer (given actual running length) the 94 is a bit more underfoot, so it's going to depend on your size. Overall, I still much preferred the Pilgrim.  I think the pilgrim is also pretty true @ 90 underfoot.? I just replaced my 169's with 179's and will be on them next month. To me, the Pilgrim is the best soft-snow "all mountain" ski out there. My favorite ski along with the Nomad; which I am getting in the new soft (SFT) model. Iclelantic's are light ski's: I mounted with Griffons which are a very light weight bindings. It's a great pairing.? If you are interested and need locate, let me know and I can put you in contact with someone from icelantic to help.

Link to Icelantics....  http://www.icelanticboards.com/#/skis/detail/pilgrim