realskiers

.......... ?But, as any good viking knows, it's not the size of the weapon, it's how good the warrior is that's wielding it. ? ?Besides, the bigger the sword, the more cumbersome it becomes...it's all about swing weight, baby....
 ?

Svend:
1. I would like to compliment you on the innuendo and suggestive nature of the post above.? Sounds like something Gary would take great pride in writing, and I can but be openly envious.? It is almost worthy of "needing moderated" so it is probably a good thing that the "Lady Moderator of the Bronx" isn't on today.

2. However, if I remember most of my Kansas world history, weren't the Vikings renowned for exactly the opposite of what you described??? At least in Hagar the Horrible I associate Vikings with large, cumbersome weapons wielded poorly (but with great effectivess due to the massive swing weight).??

I'm not sure exactly where to go with this, especially since you also started the other thread about needing a new pole, but at least I am finding myself very amusing.

Jim